One observation I made a little while ago, but was discussing with some friends last night, is about the reasons why we like things, and why our favourite things are different. My view is that it’s because we each experience the world differently – that my world is different to your world.
I suppose that a post on free will has been a long time coming so I felt perhaps I ought to get round to finally writing it. In this essay I want to make two points: 1., that claims of free will are faith-based, being made without the burden of proof we would normally require, and 2., that choices seemingly invoking free will are in fact a product of competing desires.
I’ll begin by saying it: I don’t believe in free will. I used to – in fact I used to think it was one of the most self-evident things in the world – but a few years ago when I examined the situation, I came to the conclusion that I hold now: There appears to be no acceptable evidence to support a belief in it. None at all.
Written at a time shortly after I discovered that very few traditional reasons for existence could be rationally justified. Two years on and having built a more robust existential foundation, my thoughts on this subject have evolved somewhat, though this essay continues to represent an important point in the progression of my philosophical views.